By TOM
YANCEY
Staff Writer
The Baileyton
Planning Commission voted Thursday to recommend that businessman J.W. Lamb subdivide his property
before seeking to have part of it rezoned for an automobile repair shop and tire
store.
The vote reaffirmed the consensus on the subject that was
expressed by the commissioners at their September meeting.
The result of
the action on Thursday was that Lamb was required to submit to the commission a drawing of his
property, having been surveyed and subdivided.
Once the commission
receives the drawing of the surveyed, subdivided property, the commissioners will consider rezoning
one section of the overall property for the repair shop and tire store Lamb wishes to build
there.
Background
Lamb, who has built a
mini-storage warehouse on property he owns along Baileyton's Main Street, approached the planning
commission in August about his plans to establish a second business on the lot: a repair shop and
store.
He was told then that the property is zoned B-1, and that B-3
zoning would be required for the repair shop and store.
In September,
the planning commission denied a rezoning request for the entire parcel.
Charles Anderson, Baileyton's state-contract planner, said then that the town's zoning
rules prohibit having two unrelated business buildings on the same lot.
Two members of the planning commission said at the September meeting that an auto repair shop is
something the town needs; those members were generally sympathetic to the request.
Lamb was told in September to have the property surveyed so that the planning commission
could approve dividing it into two lots, for later rezoning of the repair shop lot.
Plan Not Yet Presented
On Thursday, Lamb
returned to the commission. He said a survey had been done and the surveyor was to have provided
Anderson with a drawing.
However, Lamb did not have a drawing, and
Anderson said no surveyor had contacted him.
Mayor Tommy Casteel said
after the meeting that he had noticed stakes on the property that indicated a survey had been
done.
Without having a plan, however, the board could take no
action.
Chairman Rob Bailey said the group could not act without seeing
a plan. Anderson agreed, saying it would be unwise to do so.
Lamb then
asked how long it would be before he would be able to start on his planned building of 30 feet by 60
feet.
Anderson said the plan could be approved "next month," but noted
that the planning commission can only recommend rezoning. He pointed out that the actual zoning
change could only be made by the Baileyton Board of Mayor and Aldermen, with two readings
required.
Lamb said that, in effect, he was "back to square one," and
no closer to having the rezoning he needed than he had been in August. "I've got all my grading work
done, and I'm ready to start building," Lamb said.
Opposition
Expressed
Jerry and Patricia Hensley, who own a house and lot that
adjoin Lamb's land, had begun Thursday's meeting by saying that they objected to Lamb's
plans.
The Hensleys said their unoccupied house is next door to the
mini-warehouse building. The planned repair garage and store are on the other side of Lamb's
property, closer to Horton Highway, and to Porter's Store and Porter's Corner.
It was pointed out that the Hensleys' property is also zoned for business, and has been
since the 1980s, even though it is a residence. The house is now vacant and listed for sale.
Kilday Makes Motion
Planning Commission
member Doug Carter asked Anderson for a recommendation.
Anderson said
that, "from driving by," the area "seems mostly residential" and "the only real business I see is
(Lamb's) mini-storage building," at least on that side of the street.
Lamb then pointed out that Porter's Store, Porter's Corner and Baileyton Restaurant are all in the
immediate area, and are all zoned commercial.
Alderman Don Kilday then
said he felt the planning commission should "still go with" last month's recommendation that the
corner of Lamb's lot be subdivided from the rest of the lot before it is rezoned B-3.
Anderson told the board that B-3 would allow "virtually anything" except mobile
homes and industry. Kilday said that zoning a smaller parcel B-3 would give more control over what
the land might be used for, should it change hands later.
The Hensleys
were asked if that would satisfy their concerns. Jerry Hensley said he could not see a problem with
that action, since the portion that would later be rezoned would not adjoin the property he and his
wife own.
Bailey then asked Kilday if he would like to make into a
formal motion his recommendation about having the property subdivided and then one part of it
considered for rezoning.
When Kilday made the motion, it was
unanimously approved.